Archive

Uncategorized

Advertisements
Image representing Facebook as depicted in Cru...

Image via CrunchBase

I’ve recently developed a Facebook page where I work and some of the discussions I’ve had with colleagues have prompted me to write this post.

It’s very easy to just jump on a bandwagon as an academic library and start-up a Facebook page, Twitter feed, Youtube site, Flickr page etc etc and before long you’ll need a dedicated Social Media professional to keep it all up-to-date. Actually I don’t think it’ll be long before this is a familiar role for academic libraries, it’s already the case in many commercial companies.

But what’s the point? What’s it all for? And do students really want you invading their social spaces with details on the latest books and resources you have?

Well my response to it would simply be adapt or die. Facebook is the most visited site on the internet. End of. Anyone who works in an academic library will be used to seeing students log-in to a machine and then, almost by way of habit, log-in to Facebook. If you can at least put something about your services into that omnipresent medium you are improving your promotion of library resources and improving student’s access to information – which is surely what we’re here to do?

Other social media sites like Twitter and Youtube are worth considering but I would say Facebook is the one you need to nail first.

 

Academic publishers fight back against the Open Access movement with the US Research Works Act

The Room of Infinite Diligence

I certainly don’t think so and I am not the only one.

Dr Mike Taylor at the Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol wrote the following article in the Guardian:

Academic publishers have become the enemies of science

The US Research Works Act would allow publishers to line their pockets by locking publicly funded research behind paywalls.

This is the moment academic publishers gave up all pretence of being on the side of scientists. Their rhetoric has traditionally been of partnering with scientists, but the truth is that for some time now scientific publishers have been anti-science and anti-publication. The Research Works Act, introduced in the US Congress on 16 December, amounts to a declaration of war by the publishers.

The USA’s main funding agency for health-related research is the National Institutes of Health, with a $30bn annual budget. The NIH has a public access policy that…

View original post 455 more words

%d bloggers like this: